Theory & Research
Working Memory Theory of EMDR
The working-memory theory is the leading contemporary explanation for how bilateral stimulation contributes to memory reprocessing in EMDR.
Reviewed by the BilateralSync clinical team · Updated · 6 min read
Introduction
The working-memory theory proposes that bilateral stimulation contributes to EMDR outcomes by competing with the target memory for limited working-memory resources during recall, reducing the vividness and emotionality of the recalled image.
Evidence summary
A large body of experimental work by Van den Hout, Engelhard and colleagues supports this account: taxing working memory during recall — whether by eye movements, tones, mental arithmetic or other dual tasks — reliably reduces memory vividness and emotionality, and effects scale with cognitive load.
Clinical use
The working-memory theory has direct practical implications: sets should be long and effortful enough to genuinely tax working memory, and speed and modality can be adjusted to maintain effortful attention. It also underpins the EMDR 2.0 approach, which explicitly layers additional dual tasks to intensify working-memory taxation.
Frequently asked questions
- Does the working-memory account replace the AIP model?
- No. AIP is a clinical framework guiding the eight-phase protocol; working-memory is a mechanistic account of the reprocessing phase. They complement each other.
References
- Van den Hout, M. A. & Engelhard, I. M. (2012). How does EMDR work?
Related articles
Theory & Research
How Bilateral Stimulation Works
How does bilateral stimulation work in EMDR? A clear overview of working-memory theory, orienting response and current evidence for the mechanism of BLS.
Theory & Research
The Adaptive Information Processing Model
The AIP model is EMDR's theoretical foundation. It explains how memories are stored, why some become 'stuck', and how bilateral stimulation supports processing.
Theory & Research
EMDR 2.0
EMDR 2.0 is a working-memory-focused evolution of EMDR developed by Ad de Jongh and Suzy Matthijssen that intensifies dual-attention taxation.